/forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/feed/ Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:46:42 +0000 https://bbpress.org/?v=2.6.13 en-US /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9188 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9188 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:54:37 +0000 Morat I’m a bit confused about some of the trains like the Red Arrow that are a combined loco that can carry passengers. Are these intended to run as a single-unit train on their own, to have many of them running together as a single train, or to have carriages added?

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9199 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9199 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:37:41 +0000 Person012345 The red arrow is intended as a single unit but you can add carriages if you so desire (though it’s not very powerful so you can’t add too many without hitting performance significantly).

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9218 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9218 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:11:14 +0000 Azrael You can also combine multiple Red Arrows, so they form one train.

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9227 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9227 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:38:54 +0000 Person012345 That too, although there’s not much point (it just reduces your frequency as far as I can remember). Perhaps useful if the line is super short.

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9232 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9232 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:21:53 +0000 Traian Trante The red arrow is awesome. drop 2 of them on a line with a RE+6 passenger wagons and they will keep up the supply of passengers because of the low frequency. they wil make just enough money to keep themselves alive, but most of the money will come from the big train.

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9255 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9255 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:02:33 +0000 Morat Hmm. Never thought of using them like that to mess with the line frequency, that’s interesting. Good job they don’t calculate it as time per seat.

]]> /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9280 /forums/topic/are-the-combined-enginepassenger-trains-supposed-to-have-carriages/#post-9280 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:10:32 +0000 Traian Trante + the Arrows will always take the passengers that have been waiting the longest, so there are very few suicides in your big train.

]]>